14 shops, 90 283 products

|

Comparison: Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Nokian WR Snowproof

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Matador (38%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR Snowproof has a better rating of 55% compared to 38% of the Matador MP92 Sibir Snow. The first tyre test of Matador MP92 Sibir Snow was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the MP92 Sibir Snow and the WR Snowproof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Matador MP92 Sibir Snow has C wet grip rating, whereas 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof has B rating.

#	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /38%	Nokian WR Snowproof /55%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R15 - R18	R14 - R20
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 59

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

Number of tests

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 14x

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

Best position in test

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 5.

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 20.

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 2023

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

Best rating in test

1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

72.1%

Nokian
WR Snowproof

66.7%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Nokian WR Snowproof B

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

Costs

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR Snowproof

83.1%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

78.1%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Nokian WR Snowproof C

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

Snow

(Overall rating)

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

78.3%

Nokian
WR Snowproof

78.6%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR Snowproof

80.5%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

75.4%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR Snowproof

84.4%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

68.2%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Nokian WR Snowproof ?

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

79.3%

Nokian
WR Snowproof

79.9%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	37,4	28,6
Nokian WR Snowproof	36,5	29,2
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	34,8	-
Nokian WR Snowproof	32,2	24,6
Show test details