Segment
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
Comparison: Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Nokian WR D4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Matador (38%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the MP92 Sibir Snow and the WR D4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Matador MP92 Sibir Snow has C wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Nokian WR D4 has B rating.
| # | Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
| Nokian WR D4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet circle cornering
1. Nokian WR D4 76%
Wet handling
2. Nokian WR D4 70%
Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian WR D4 72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian WR D4 72%
Wet braking
2. Nokian WR D4 76%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Nokian WR D4 85%
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
1. Nokian WR D4 86%
Snow handling
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
Snow traction
1. Nokian WR D4 88%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
1. Nokian WR D4 79%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian WR D4 78%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2- | 2- | 2- | ||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3 | 2- | 1 | 2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 36,6 | 28,6 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 27,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 38,4 | - | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 35 | 27,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 40,6 | 26,4 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 26,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | Dobré | 2,3 | 2,1 | 1,7 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,5 |
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: - | Dostatečné | 3,7 | 2,6 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 1,9 |
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: - | Uspokojivé | 2,6 | 2,4 | 2,2 | 2,1 | 3,1 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
