Segment
1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost2. Kormoran SNOW Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Matador winter tyres are slightly better rated (38%) than Kormoran (14%). In this particular case, the Matador MP92 Sibir Snow has a better rating of 38% compared to 6% of the Kormoran SNOW. The first tyre test of Matador MP92 Sibir Snow was done in 2015, compared to 2021 when was the Kormoran SNOW first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the MP92 Sibir Snow and the SNOW were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Matador MP92 Sibir Snow dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Kormoran SNOW also have C wet ratings.
# | Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
| Kormoran SNOW
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R15 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost2. Kormoran SNOW Lowcost
2. Kormoran SNOW 16.
2. Kormoran SNOW 38.
2. Kormoran SNOW 30.33
1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 37,4 | 28,6 | |||||
Kormoran Snow | 39,1 | ||||||
Show test details |