• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Matador (38%). The first tyre test of Matador MP92 Sibir Snow was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the MP92 Sibir Snow and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Matador MP92 Sibir Snow has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has B rating.

# Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
/0%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
/84%

Add to comparison

Matador
BFGoodrich
DimensionsR15 - R18 R14 - R19
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,127,3
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow37,428,6
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 235,627,9
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,225,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow38,4-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 235,125,9
Show test details