Segment
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Matador (38%). The first tyre test of Matador MP92 Sibir Snow was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the MP92 Sibir Snow and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Matador MP92 Sibir Snow has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has B rating.
# | Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R14 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 37,4 | 28,6 | |||||
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,6 | 27,9 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 38,4 | - | |||||
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,1 | 25,9 | |||||
Show test details |