Segment
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle2. Matador MP62 All Weather Evo Lowcost
Comparison: Matador MP62 All Weather Evo vs. Kumho Solus HA31
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Matador (1%). But when it comes to comparing Matador MP62 All Weather Evo and Kumho Solus HA31, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Matador MP62 All Weather Evo was done in 2019, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho Solus HA31 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the MP62 All Weather Evo and the Solus HA31 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Matador MP62 All Weather Evo dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Kumho Solus HA31 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Matador MP62 All Weather Evo
| Kumho Solus HA31
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Solus HA31 8.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Matador MP62 All Weather Evo | 46,1 | 51,6 | |||||
| Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
