Segment
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Premium2. Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP Lowcost
Comparison: Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP vs. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Linglong (1%). The first tyre test of Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Vredestein Wintrac Pro first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 225/50 R17 test, where both the Green-Max Winter UHP and the Wintrac Pro were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 1,5 | |
| Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP Rating: Poor | 5,5 | 3,5 | 2,2 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 2,5 | |
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro Rating: Satisfactory | 2,3 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 3,0 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP | 35,2 | - | |||||
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro | 30,8 | 25,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
