Segment
1. Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP Lowcost2. ESA+TECAR SUPERGRIP PRO Lowcost
Comparison: Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP vs. ESA+TECAR SUPERGRIP PRO
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (ESA+TECAR). Generally, ESA+TECAR winter tyres are slightly better rated (56%) than Linglong (1%). The first tyre test of Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP was done in 2019, compared to 2021 when was the ESA+TECAR SUPERGRIP PRO first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 225/50 R17 test, where both the Green-Max Winter UHP and the SUPERGRIP PRO were tested.
| # | Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP
| ESA+TECAR SUPERGRIP PRO
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. ESA+TECAR SUPERGRIP PRO Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. ESA+TECAR SUPERGRIP PRO Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 1,5 |
| Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 5,5 | 3,5 | 2,2 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 2,5 |
| ESA+TECAR SUPERGRIP PRO Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 3,1 | 2,1 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 2,5 |
| Show test details | |||||||
