Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle2. Laufenn I Fit LW31 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Laufenn winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Kumho (38%). In this particular case, the Laufenn I Fit LW31 has a better rating of 51% compared to 20% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP51. The first tyre test of Laufenn I Fit LW31 was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP51 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 195/65 R15 test, where both the I Fit LW31 and the WinterCraft WP51 were tested.
# | Laufenn I Fit LW31
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle2. Laufenn I Fit LW31 Lowcost
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory2. Laufenn I Fit LW31 Satisfactory
1. Laufenn I Fit LW31 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,9 | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,0 |
Laufenn I Fit LW31 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,2 | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,0 | 2,9 | 3,0 |
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 3,0 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 2,7 | 3,0 |
Show test details |