Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium2. Laufenn G Fit 4S Lowcost
Comparison: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Laufenn (32%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 has a better rating of 93% compared to 32% of the Laufenn G Fit 4S. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 225/50 R17 test, where both the G Fit 4S and the CrossClimate 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Laufenn G Fit 4S
| Michelin CrossClimate 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Laufenn G Fit 4S 18.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Test winner
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S | 42.7 | 58.2 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 37.9 | 56.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S | 45,2 | 53,9 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 39,9 | 49,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S | 43,6 | 55,2 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 37,6 | 53,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
