Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium2. Laufenn G Fit 4S Lowcost
Comparison: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook allround tyres are slightly better rated (91%) than Laufenn (32%). In this particular case, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 has a better rating of 89% compared to 32% of the Laufenn G Fit 4S. The first tyre test of Laufenn G Fit 4S was done in 2021, compared to 2018 when was the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 195/55 R16 test, where both the G Fit 4S and the Kinergy 4S2 H750 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Laufenn G Fit 4S
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Laufenn G Fit 4S 18.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S | 45,2 | 53,9 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 42,1 | 48 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S | 43,6 | 55,2 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 40,3 | 52,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
