Segment
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium2. Laufenn G Fit 4S Lowcost
Comparison: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs. Continental AllSeasonContact
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental allround tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Laufenn (32%). In this particular case, the Continental AllSeasonContact has a better rating of 77% compared to 32% of the Laufenn G Fit 4S. The first tyre test of Laufenn G Fit 4S was done in 2021, compared to 2018 when was the Continental AllSeasonContact first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 195/55 R16 test, where both the G Fit 4S and the AllSeasonContact were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Laufenn G Fit 4S
| Continental AllSeasonContact
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Laufenn G Fit 4S 18.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S | 45,2 | 53,9 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact | 45,8 | 48,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S | 43,6 | 55,2 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact | 42,3 | 53 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
