Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WS71 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WS71 vs. Nokian WR SUV 3
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Kumho (38%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho WinterCraft WS71 and Nokian WR SUV 3, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WS71 was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR SUV 3 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho WinterCraft WS71 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (80%) of the Nokian WR SUV 3 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WS71
| Nokian WR SUV 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WS71 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WS71 Satisfactory
