Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WS71 vs. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (38%) than GT (37%). The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WS71 was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Offroad 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the WinterCraft WS71 and the Radial Champiro WinterPro HP were tested.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WS71
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R16 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WS71 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 4 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Rating: Satisfactory | 3- | 2- | 2- | 1- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
