Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Kumho (38%). The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the WinterCraft WP71 and the WR Snowproof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 has C wet grip rating, whereas 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof has B rating.
# | Kumho WinterCraft WP71
| Nokian WR Snowproof
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R14 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2+ | 3+ | 2 | 3 | |||
Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 31,5 | 24,8 | |||||
Nokian WR Snowproof | 32,2 | 24,6 | |||||
Show test details |