• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Kumho (38%). The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the WinterCraft WP71 and the WR Snowproof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 has C wet grip rating, whereas 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof has B rating.

# Kumho WinterCraft WP71
/0%
Nokian WR Snowproof
/46%

Add to comparison

Kumho
Nokian
DimensionsR16 - R19 R14 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+2+12+
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
Rating: Conditionally recommended
2+ 3+23
Nokian WR Snowproof
Rating: Good
2-2-2+2-
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test29,224
Kumho WinterCraft WP7131,524,8
Nokian WR Snowproof32,224,6
Show test details