Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle2. Kormoran SNOW Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs. Kormoran SNOW
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (38%) than Kormoran (14%). The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 was done in 2016, compared to 2021 when was the Kormoran SNOW first tested.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WP71
| Kormoran SNOW
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Kormoran SNOW 16.
Worst position in test
2. Kormoran SNOW 38.
Average position in tests
2. Kormoran SNOW 30.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Kormoran SNOW 68%
Wet braking
2. Kormoran SNOW 67%
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Kormoran SNOW 55%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
1. Kormoran SNOW 95%
Snow braking
1. Kormoran SNOW 100%
Snow cornering
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Kormoran SNOW 73%
