Segment
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Kumho (38%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho WinterCraft WP71 and Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 255/35 R19 test, where both the WinterCraft WP71 and the Winter i*cept evo2 W320 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WP71
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2 | 1- | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3- | 2- | 1- | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2- | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2- | 2 | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2 | 2- | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | ||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2- | 2 | 2+ | ||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2 | 3+ | 2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vítěz testu - velmi doporučeno | 9,6 | 9,2 | 9,9 | 10 | ||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Still recommended | ještě doporučeno | 7,1 | 7,8 | 7,8 | 6,5 | ||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: Still recommended | ještě doporučeno | 6,8 | 8,3 | 8,1 | 7,3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
