Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken winter tyres are slightly better rated (44%) than Kumho (38%). The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Falken EuroWinter HS01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 225/40 R18 test, where both the WinterCraft WP71 and the EuroWinter HS01 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Falken EuroWinter HS01 has B rating.
# | Kumho WinterCraft WP71
| Falken EuroWinter HS01
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R13 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle
1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2+ | 2- | 3 | ||||
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2- | 1- | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 35,7 | 28 | |||||
Falken EuroWinter HS01 | 37 | 27 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 31,5 | 24,8 | |||||
Falken EuroWinter HS01 | 33,9 | 26,1 | |||||
Show test details |