Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Kumho (38%). The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 225/40 R18 test, where both the WinterCraft WP71 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WP71
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2 | 1- | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 2+ | 2- | 3 | |||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2- | 1- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | ||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 2+ | 3+ | 2 | 3 | ||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good | dobré | 2+ | 2- | 1- | 2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | ||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2- | 2 | 2+ | ||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2- | 1 | 2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 34,8 | 29,2 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,1 | 25,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||