Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP51 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Yokohama winter tyres are slightly better rated (46%) than Kumho (38%). The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP51 was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 205/55 R16 test, where both the WinterCraft WP51 and the BluEarth winter V905 were tested. We also know where WinterCraft WP51 is made - Korea.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WP51
| Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient
Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 |
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,3 | 3,2 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 2,0 | 2,6 |
| Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,5 | 2,9 | 3,1 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | ||||||||