Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Kumho (38%). The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP51 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 195/65 R15 test, where both the WinterCraft WP51 and the WR Snowproof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 96% of Kumho WinterCraft WP51 has C wet grip rating, whereas 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WinterCraft WP51 is made in Korea and WR Snowproof is made in Finland/Russian Federation.
# | Kumho WinterCraft WP51
| Nokian WR Snowproof
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R14 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,9 | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,0 | |
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Rating: Sufficient | 3,0 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 2,7 | 3,0 | |
Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 2,5 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,9 | 2,5 | |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 37,8 | 29,8 | |||||
Nokian WR Snowproof | 36,5 | 29,2 | |||||
Show test details |