• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP51 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Kumho (38%). The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP51 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 195/65 R15 test, where both the WinterCraft WP51 and the WR Snowproof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 96% of Kumho WinterCraft WP51 has C wet grip rating, whereas 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WinterCraft WP51 is made in Korea and WR Snowproof is made in Finland/Russian Federation.

# Kumho WinterCraft WP51
/0%
Nokian WR Snowproof
/46%

Add to comparison

Kumho
Nokian
DimensionsR13 - R17 R14 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC
Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWear
Best values in test1,61,91,92,02,62,0
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Rating: Sufficient
3,03,62,52,42,73,0
Nokian WR Snowproof
Rating: Satisfactory
3,32,52,32,22,92,5
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,127,3
Kumho WinterCraft WP5137,829,8
Nokian WR Snowproof36,529,2
Show test details