Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Kumho (38%). Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2018 185/65 R15 test, where both the WinterCraft WP51 and the Blizzak LM-001 were tested. See more mutual tests below. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WinterCraft WP51 is made in Korea and Blizzak LM-001 is made in Poland.
# | Kumho WinterCraft WP51
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R14 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient
Name | Points total | Rating | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Running costs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 206 | vítěz testu | 67 | 68 | 43 | 19 | 8 | 10 |
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Rating: Recommended | 183 | doporučeno | 60 | 56 | 40 | 13 | 5 | 9 |
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended | 182 | doporučeno | 58 | 53 | 43 | 15 | 6 | 7 |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 41,0 | - | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 38,5 | 25,9 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 42,5 | 30,2 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 43,4 | 28,1 | |||||
Show test details |