Segment
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle2. Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Solus HA31 vs. Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Yokohama (38%). The first tyre test of Kumho Solus HA31 was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Solus HA31 and the BluEarth-4S AW21 were tested.
| # | Kumho Solus HA31
| Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Solus HA31 8.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 Satisfactory2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 Satisfactory2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
| Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 | 44,1 | 52,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
