Segment
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle2. Viking Fourtech Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho Solus HA31 vs. Viking Fourtech
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Viking (45%). The first tyre test of Kumho Solus HA31 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Viking Fourtech first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Solus HA31 and the Fourtech were tested.
| # | Kumho Solus HA31
| Viking Fourtech
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Solus HA31 8.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory2. Viking Fourtech Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory2. Viking Fourtech Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
| Viking Fourtech | 46 | 53,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
