Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate+ Premium2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Kumho (52%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate+ has a better rating of 71% compared to 31% of the Kumho Solus HA31. The first tyre test of Kumho Solus HA31 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Michelin CrossClimate+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Solus HA31 and the CrossClimate+ were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho Solus HA31 has C wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Michelin CrossClimate+ has B rating.
# | Kumho Solus HA31 | Michelin CrossClimate+ | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R13 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin CrossClimate+ Premium2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
2. Kumho Solus HA31 8.33
1. Michelin CrossClimate+ Exemplary2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory2. Michelin CrossClimate+ Sufficient
2. Kumho Solus HA31 ? dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | |||
Kumho Solus HA31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | |||
Michelin CrossClimate+ Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
Michelin CrossClimate+ | 39,9 | 48,6 | |||||
Show test details |