Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Solus HA31 vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook allround tyres are slightly better rated (91%) than Kumho (71%). The first tyre test of Kumho Solus HA31 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Solus HA31 and the Kinergy 4S2 H750 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Kumho Solus HA31
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Solus HA31 8.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | ||
| Kumho Solus HA31 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | dobré | 2- | 2 | 1- | 2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 42 | 50,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
