Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook allround tyres are slightly better rated (91%) than Kumho (71%). The first tyre test of Kumho Solus HA31 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Solus HA31 and the Kinergy 4S2 H750 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho Solus HA31 has C wet grip rating, whereas 96% of Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 has B rating.
# | Kumho Solus HA31
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R14 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
2. Kumho Solus HA31 8.33
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | |||
Kumho Solus HA31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | |||
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 1- | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 42 | 50,8 | |||||
Show test details |