Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium2. Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Kumho (71%). The first tyre test of Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ was done in 2024, compared to 2021 when was the Michelin CrossClimate 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 225/50 R17 test, where both the Solus 4S HA32+ and the CrossClimate 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
| Michelin CrossClimate 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R15 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium2. Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ Upper-middle
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Test winner
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ | 42.5 | 57.9 | |||||
Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 37.9 | 56.4 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 5.4 | velmi dobré | 1.8 | 2.3 | |||
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ Rating: Good | 2.8 | dobré | 2.3 | 3 | |||
Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Good | 2.7 | dobré | 2.2 | 2.9 | |||
Show test details |