Comparison: Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Kumho (71%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 has a better rating of 93% compared to 65% of the Kumho Solus 4S HA32+. The first tyre test of Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ was done in 2024, compared to 2021 when was the Michelin CrossClimate 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 225/50 R17 test, where both the Solus 4S HA32+ and the CrossClimate 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin CrossClimate 2 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
| Michelin CrossClimate 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ | 42.5 | 57.9 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 37.9 | 56.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 5.4 | 1.8 | 2.3 | ||||
| Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ Rating: Good | 2.8 | 2.3 | 3 | ||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Good | 2.7 | 2.2 | 2.9 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
