Segment
1. Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ Upper-middle2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Kleber (46%). The first tyre test of Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ was done in 2024, compared to 2022 when was the Kleber Quadraxer 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 225/50 R17 test, where both the Solus 4S HA32+ and the Quadraxer 3 were tested.
| # | Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
| Kleber Quadraxer 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ | 42.5 | 57.9 | |||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 | 38.5 | 58.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
