Segment
1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Kumho (38%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho PorTran CW51 and Continental VanContact Winter, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Kumho PorTran CW51 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Continental VanContact Winter first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the PorTran CW51 and the VanContact Winter were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho PorTran CW51 has C wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Continental VanContact Winter has B rating.
# | Kumho PorTran CW51
| Continental VanContact Winter
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Kumho PorTran CW51 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3,6 | 4,1 | 3,0 | 2,6 | 3,0 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 3,0 | 2,2 |
Show test details |