• 12 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Kumho PorTran CW51 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Kumho (38%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho PorTran CW51 and Bridgestone Blizzak W810, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the PorTran CW51 and the Blizzak W810 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho PorTran CW51 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (76%) of the Bridgestone Blizzak W810 also have C wet ratings.

# Kumho PorTran CW51
/0%
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
/0%

Add to comparison

Kumho
Bridgestone
DimensionsR14 - R17 R14 - R17
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC
Name RatingWetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in testdoporučeno2,42,32,22,32,52,01,6
Kumho PorTran CW51
Rating: Conditionally recommended
podmíněně doporučeno3,64,13,02,63,03,02,0
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Rating: Conditionally recommended
podmíněně doporučeno4,04,12,62,83,73,02,0
Show test details