• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Kumho PorTran CW51 vs. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Kumho (38%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho PorTran CW51 and BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the PorTran CW51 and the ACTIVAN WINTER were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho PorTran CW51 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER has B rating.

# Kumho PorTran CW51
/0%
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
/0%

Add to comparison

Kumho
BFGoodrich
DimensionsR14 - R17 R14 - R16
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC
Name RatingWetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in testdoporučeno2,42,32,22,32,52,01,6
Kumho PorTran CW51
Rating: Conditionally recommended
podmíněně doporučeno3,64,13,02,63,03,02,0
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
Rating: Not recommended
nedoporučeno4,93,43,12,3 3,32,0 1,7
Show test details