Segment
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Kumho (38%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho PorTran CW51 and BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the PorTran CW51 and the ACTIVAN WINTER were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho PorTran CW51 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER has B rating.
# | Kumho PorTran CW51
| BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R16 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Upper-middle
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended
1. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Kumho PorTran CW51 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3,6 | 4,1 | 3,0 | 2,6 | 3,0 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Rating: Not recommended | nedoporučeno | 4,9 | 3,4 | 3,1 | 2,3 | 3,3 | 2,0 | 1,7 |
Show test details |