Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Premium2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Vredestein Quatrac
Table of contents:
| # | Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
| Vredestein Quatrac
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R15 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Kumho HA32 Solus 4S and the Vredestein Quatrac are both rated as allround tyres and have promising features. Made in China and Hungary, these tyres outperformed several competitors in a series of tests displayed on our website.
The Kumho HA32 Solus 4S has a rating of 73% from our verdict. Its strengths are reduced exterior noise levels, considerable snow braking, and controlled aquaplaning, which made it take the 10th place among 32 tyres tested by Autobild. However, it has some shortcomings, which include slightly extended wet and dry braking, increased rolling resistance, and moderate aquaplaning reserves. Although it scored top in exterior noise in several test features, it's necessary to note its weaknesses for customers to make informed decisions. Find more about this tyre on Kumho manufacturer's page.
On the other hand, the Vredestein Quatrac is a perfect all-round tyre with a rating of 94%. It took the 2nd position among 32 tyres in Autobild's test and scored well in wet braking, wet circle cornering, dry braking, and comfort. The aquaplaning reserves allow it to thrive in all weather conditions, and it offers a pleasant noise comfort level. Despite offering an average mileage, the impressive features put it at the front of its competitors. Discover more about this tyre on the Vredestein manufacturer's page.
In comparison, while Kumho HA32 Solus 4S scores well on noise comfort and snow braking, it struggles with some extended braking distances and increased rolling resistance, which might be factors to consider for certain drivers. Vredestein Quatrac, with its superior wet and dry performance and comfort, is clearly a top contender but falls short in the mileage category.
Verdict: While both the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S and the Vredestein Quatrac are compelling all-round tyre options, the Vredestein Quatrac edges out the Kumho with its superior performance in different conditions and maintains a higher overall rating. The decision may come down to certain factors like noise comfort, aquaplaning capabilities, wet braking, and cornering performance that are important to the driver.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Exemplary2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Recommended2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Price/value
Mileage
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41.4 | 49.8 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 40.3 | 45.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | ||||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | ||||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,4 | 51,9 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 41,7 | 47,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | uspokojivé | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Good | dobré | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2+ | ||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 2- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2 | 2- | 3+ | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vítěz testu | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2 | 2 | 2+ | 3 | ||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1 | 1- | 2 | 1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,3 | 49,3 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 40,6 | 46,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
