Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate Premium2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Kumho (52%). In this particular case, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S has a better rating of 73% compared to 56% of the Michelin CrossClimate. The first tyre test of Kumho HA32 Solus 4S was done in 2020, compared to 2015 when was the Michelin CrossClimate first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 93% of Kumho HA32 Solus 4S dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin CrossClimate also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the HA32 Solus 4S is made in China and CrossClimate is made in Germany.
# | Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | Michelin CrossClimate | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R14 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin CrossClimate Premium2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.78
1. Michelin CrossClimate Exemplary2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory2. Michelin CrossClimate Sufficient