Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Kumho (60%). In this particular case, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S has a better rating of 74% compared to 16% of the Kumho Ecsta PS91. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta PS91 was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S first tested. Important for this comparison is also the SportAuto 2023 225/40 R18 test, where both the Ecsta PS91 and the Pilot Sport 4 S were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 70% of Kumho Ecsta PS91 has B wet grip rating, whereas 64% of Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S has A rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Ecsta PS91 is made in Korea and Pilot Sport 4 S is made in United States.
# | Kumho Ecsta PS91
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R18 - R21 | R18 - R23 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
1. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Good | |||||||
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Rating: Very good | |||||||
Show test details |