Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Kumho (60%). Important for this comparison is also the Sportauto 2015 235/35 R19 test, where both the Ecsta PS91 and the Potenza S001 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Kumho Ecsta PS91 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (68%) of the Bridgestone Potenza S001 also have B wet ratings. We also know where Ecsta PS91 is made - Korea.
# | Kumho Ecsta PS91
| Bridgestone Potenza S001
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R18 - R21 | R17 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 9,3 | vysoce doporučeno | 6 | 7,6 | 7 | ||
Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,5 | podmíněně doporučeno | 6 | 8,8 | 7,3 | ||
Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,5 | podmíněně doporučeno | 7,6 | 7,6 | 7 | ||
Show test details |