Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
Table of contents:
| # | Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R17 - R24 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this article, we will be comparing two summer tyres - the Kumho Ecsta PS71 and the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti. Both tyres have been tested and reviewed by various sources, and we will summarize the data to provide you with a comprehensive overview of their strengths and weaknesses.
The Kumho Ecsta PS71 is a summer tyre that has not yet been replaced by a newer model. It has an overall rating of 79%, showcasing its reliable performance on the road. The tyre is not made for original equipment and its country of origin is not specified. Its main strengths lie in aquaplaning, both cross and longitudinal, as evidenced by its performance in the ADAC test where it achieved 10th place out of 16 tested tyres.
On the other hand, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti is also a summer tyre that has not been replaced by a newer model. Produced in the Netherlands, it has a higher overall rating of 87% compared to the Kumho Ecsta PS71. Similar to the Kumho tyre, it is not designed for original equipment. The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti performed better in the mutual tests, especially in the Autobild test where it placed 9th out of 53 tested tyres. Its best features in this test were aquaplaning (cross), wet braking, wet handling, and wet side guide.
In the ADAC test, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti achieved a 7th place finish, ranking higher than the Kumho Ecsta PS71. Its best features in this test were mileage and exterior noise, showcasing its long-lasting performance and quiet ride. Considering the results of both tests, it's evident that the Vredestein tyre generally outperforms the Kumho tyre in various aspects, making it the better choice overall.
When it comes to their respective manufacturers, Kumho is known for producing reliable and high-quality tyres at affordable prices, and their Ecsta PS71 model is no exception. Vredestein, on the other hand, has a long history of manufacturing performance-oriented tyres that are both safe and comfortable, and the Ultrac Vorti is a perfect example of this.
In conclusion, if you're in the market for a summer tyre, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti is the better choice, offering greater performance capabilities and a higher overall rating. However, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is still a reliable option, especially in aquaplaning scenarios, making it a solid choice for those on a budget or looking for specific features. Ultimately, the choice will depend on your specific needs and preferences.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 1- | 1 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 1 | 2 | 3- | |||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2+ | 1- | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34,9 | 29 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | 33,4 | 31,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | |
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,3 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 3,0 | 2,0 | |
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 2,4 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2 | 2- | 3- | |||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 37,1 | 31,6 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | 35,3 | 30,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||