Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2
Table of contents:
| # | Kumho Ecsta PS71 | Sava Intensa UHP 2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this tyre comparison, we are looking at the Kumho Ecsta PS71 and the Sava Intensa UHP 2 summer tyres. Both tyres have been put through various tests such as Autobild, ADAC 2017, and ADAC 2021. Let's dive into the strengths and weaknesses of each tyre, and see how they fare against each other.
Kumho Ecsta PS71
The Kumho Ecsta PS71 is a summer tyre from South Korean tyre manufacturer Kumho. According to our rating, it scores 79% in overall performance. The tyre has not been replaced by a newer model, and there are no previous models for this tyre.
The Kumho Ecsta PS71 performed well in the tests, with some of its strengths including:
- Highly balanced performance
- Good handling on wet and dry surfaces
- Short braking distances on wet and dry roads
- Fair price
However, it has a few drawbacks:
- Increased rolling noise
- No exceptional weaknesses
In the Autobild test, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 ranked 18th out of 53 tyres. In the ADAC 2017 test, it showed excellent aquaplaning resistance and ranked 10th out of 16 tyres. In the ADAC 2021 test, it was especially good on wet surfaces.
Sava Intensa UHP 2
The Sava Intensa UHP 2 is a summer tyre from the Slovenian tyre manufacturer Sava. It is the successor to the Sava Intensa UHP and scores 76% in overall performance according to our rating.
The Sava Intensa UHP 2 also performed decently in various tests, with some strengths including:
- Short dry braking distances
- Low rolling resistance
- Affordable price
- Good fuel efficiency and mileage
- Low external noise
On the other hand, the tyre has some weaknesses:
- Understeering handling on wet and dry roads
- Average aquaplaning resistance
- Increased wear
- Weaknesses on wet surfaces, leading to a downgrade in ADAC 2021 test
In the Autobild test, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 ranked 17th and outperformed the Kumho Ecsta PS71. It also ranked higher (6th) in the ADAC 2017 test with strengths in noise levels, fuel efficiency, and mileage. However, the ADAC 2021 test showed that the tyre had weaknesses on wet surfaces, lowering its position slightly.
Verdict
Overall, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 has balanced performance, good wet and dry handling, and fair pricing, making it a strong choice. However, the tyre does have increased rolling noise, and the Sava Intensa UHP 2 is a more affordable option with better fuel efficiency and mileage, as well as a lower external noise. The Sava Intensa UHP 2 outperformed the Kumho Ecsta PS71 in the Autobild test and had a higher position in the ADAC 2017 test, but scored lower in the ADAC 2021 test due to its weaknesses on wet surfaces.
Although both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses, if you prioritize a balanced performance and good wet handling, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 may suit you better. However, if you value an affordable tyre with better fuel efficiency, mileage, and lower noise level, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 would be the wiser choice, with the caveat that its performance on wet surfaces may not be as strong.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9.332. Sava Intensa UHP 2 11.31
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry driving behavior
Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 72 dB2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 ? dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 61.7 | 26.6 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 61.7 | 27.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 2,0 | |||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34,9 | 29 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 34,7 | 35,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,3 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 3,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,8 | 3,1 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 3- | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 37,1 | 31,6 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35,7 | 32,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||