Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Kumho (60%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 has a better rating of 77% compared to 76% of the Kumho Ecsta PS71. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta PS71 was done in 2018, compared to 2023 when was the Bridgestone Turanza 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the Ecsta PS71 and the Turanza 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Kumho Ecsta PS71 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (79%) of the Bridgestone Turanza 6 also have A wet ratings.
# | Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Bridgestone Turanza 6
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R16 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2- | ||||
Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 2- | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 61.7 | 26.6 | |||||
Bridgestone Turanza 6 | 63.8 | 27.6 | |||||
Show test details |