Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Kumho (60%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 has a better rating of 77% compared to 64% of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV was done in 2025, compared to 2023 when was the Bridgestone Turanza 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 255/55 R18 test, where both the Ecsta PS71 SUV and the Turanza 6 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (79%) of the Bridgestone Turanza 6 also have A wet ratings.
# | Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
| Bridgestone Turanza 6
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Upper-middle
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary
Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
Bridgestone Turanza 6 | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
Show test details |