Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle2. Riken Road Performance Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Riken Road Performance
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Riken). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Riken (9%). The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta HS52 was done in 2022, compared to 2021 when was the Riken Road Performance first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Ecsta HS52 and the Road Performance were tested.
| # | Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Riken Road Performance
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R15 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 1,8 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,7 | 2,3 | ||||
| Riken Road Performance Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 3,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||