Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Laufenn (58%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has a better rating of 78% compared to 52% of the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta HS52 was done in 2022, compared to 2021 when was the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Ecsta HS52 and the S Fit EQ+ LK01 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R15 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Lowcost
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Satisfactory
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Sufficient
Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 1,8 | ||||
Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,7 | 2,3 | ||||
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 3,9 | 2,9 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,7 | 28,6 | |||||
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 | 36,5 | 31,9 | |||||
Show test details |