Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Kumho (60%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has a better rating of 78% compared to 52% of the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta HS52 was done in 2022, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 77% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (72%) of the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
