• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

# Kumho Ecsta HS52
/78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
/84%

Add to comparison

Kumho
Goodyear
DimensionsR14 - R18 R15 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

In this review, we compare two summer tyres: the Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2.


Kumho Ecsta HS52


The Kumho Ecsta HS52 is a touring tyre that replaced the Kumho Ecsta HS51. In our website's rating, it scored 78%. Its strengths include Dry braking, Dry handling, Wet braking and Price/value, according to autobild test. However, it displays minor weaknesses in Aquaplaning and rolling comfort. On average, this tyre achieved a top three position in comparative tests, notably securing the third spot in both Vibilagare and Autobild tests.


Verdict


The Kumho Ecsta HS52 delivers convincing performance on wet and dry surfaces with short braking distances. It provides safe handling on both dry and wet roads with excellent predicted mileage and low wear and fuel consumption. However, slight weaknesses in Aquaplaning behaviour and high tyre weight are noticeable.


Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2


Replacing the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 scores a respectable 84% rating on our website. Its most praised categories are mileage, Price/value and Comfort, as marked in Autobild test. Its weaknesses include slightly average Aquaplaning resistance, and extended dry braking. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 also impressively grabbed the first position in ADAC test, outperforming 50 competitive tyres.


Verdict


The Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 is a well-balanced tyre, offering excellent handling on wet and dry surfaces, low noise levels, good comfort, and low rolling resistance. Its high mileage, low rolling resistance and Best ratings in cost category make it an attractive choice. However, it loses points for its slightly average Aquaplaning resistance and extended dry braking.


Overall Comparison


Summing up all the tests, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 slightly edges out the Kumho Ecsta HS52 for its better overall performance, handling and comfort. However, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 goes head to head, considering its affordable price and strong performance on both wet and dry surfaces.


Check out the detailed specification of Kumho Ecsta HS52 and Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2. Learn more about the manufacturers - Kumho and Goodyear.

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Vibilagare
Name Points total
Best values in test87
Kumho Ecsta HS5284
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 280
Show test details
Autobild
Name Rating
Best values in testpříkladné
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Rating: Good
dobré
GoodYear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Rating: Exemplary
příkladné
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,425,8
Kumho Ecsta HS5235,4 26,1
GoodYear Efficient Grip Performance 236,429,2
Show test details
ADAC
Name RatingEnviromental impactDriving safety
Best values in testdobré1,61,7
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Rating: Good
dobré 2,82,1
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé1,6 3,2
Show test details
Tyre Reviews
Name Rating
Best values in testvítěz testu1
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Rating: Recommended
doporučeno1
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Rating: Highly recommended
vysoce doporučeno1
Show test details
ADAC
Name RatingEnviromental impactDriving safety
Best values in testdobré1,31,8
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Rating: Good
dobré 2,72,3
GoodYear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Rating: Good
dobré 1,72,1
Show test details
Autobild
Name RatingWetDryRunning costs
Best values in testpříkladné12+1+
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Rating: Good
dobré222
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Rating: Exemplary
příkladné 2+2+ 1+
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,727,5
Kumho Ecsta HS5235,7 28,6
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 236,829,7
Show test details