14 shops, 90 283 products

|

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Apollo Alnac 4G

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Apollo (43%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has a better rating of 78% compared to 46% of the Apollo Alnac 4G. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta HS52 was done in 2022, compared to 2015 when was the Apollo Alnac 4G first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Ecsta HS52 and the Alnac 4G were tested. See more mutual tests below.

#	Kumho Ecsta HS52 /78%	Apollo Alnac 4G /46%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R14 - R18	R14 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle

2. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 88

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 32

Number of tests

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 8x

Best position in test

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 2.

Worst position in test

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 30.

Average position in tests

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88

Year of the last test

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 2023

Best rating in test

1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good

2. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Alnac 4G

79%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

78%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Apollo Alnac 4G 68%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 59%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Apollo Alnac 4G 82%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

Wet braking

1. Apollo Alnac 4G 69%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 69%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Apollo Alnac 4G ?

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Alnac 4G

87%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

84%

Exterior noise

1. Apollo Alnac 4G 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Apollo Alnac 4G ?

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

71%

Apollo
Alnac 4G

60%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

2. Apollo Alnac 4G ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

88%

Apollo
Alnac 4G

73%

Dry braking

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 91%

2. Apollo Alnac 4G 75%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autoklub ČR

Autoklub ČR Summer tyre test 2023 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry
Best values in test	104,7	106	103,4
Kumho Ecsta HS52	96,9	94,3	99,5
Apollo Alnac 4G	96,7	97,3	96,1
Show test details

ADAC

ADAC Summer tyre test 2023 205/55 R16

Name	Rating	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	dobré	1,3	1,8
Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good	dobré	2,7	2,3
Apollo Alnac 4G Rating: Good	chvalitebné	3,5	3,0
Show test details