Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Upper-middle2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs. Fulda EcoControl HP2
Table of contents:
| # | Kumho Ecsta HS51
| Fulda EcoControl HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Comparing the Kumho Ecsta HS51 and the Fulda EcoControl HP2 reveals some key differences between the two summer tyres. Both have been tested by professionals in the industry, ranking in various positions across multiple categories.
The Kumho Ecsta HS51 outperforms the Fulda EcoControl HP2 in several parameters such as aquaplaning, wet handling and wet side guiding. This is supported by results from Autobild and ADAC where it took the 3rd and the 5th position respectively. Notably, this model from Kumho exhibits strong performance in terms of price/value, making it a cost-effective choice for budget-minded consumers. The tyre is manufactured in China and has been replaced by a newer model, Kumho Ecsta HS52. Our rating for this tyre is 78%, indicating a good overall performance.
Shifting focus to the Fulda EcoControl HP2, this tyre shows promising capabilities in resisting aquaplaning, both longitudinally and crosswise. However, it didn't perform as well as the Kumho HS51, ranking 20th and 8th in the Autobild and ADAC tests respectively. The performance in aquaplaning denotes the tyre's ability to maintain control on wet surfaces, a vital safety aspect. This model does not have a newer version to replace it. Our rating for this tyre is 71%.
Despite being the predecessor of the Fulda EcoControl HP2, the EcoControl HP still has a reputable performance. This tyre shows its strength primarily in noise reduction, making it a comfortable choice for long drives.
Verdict: The Kumho HS51 stands out as an overall superior option, based on test results and our ratings. It offers balanced pros, with an impressive ranking in terms of wet handling, aquaplaning resistance and value for price. However, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 is commendable, especially in terms of reducing noise and aquaplaning resistance, still making it a good choice in certain conditions.
Please note that tyre performance may vary significantly based on the conditions they are subjected to, therefore, choose the one best suited to your needs and preferences.
For details on these models and even more options, feel free to check out the manufacturers: Kumho and Fulda.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 12.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Satisfactory2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 70 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 | 34,8 | 30,4 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 | 36,0 | 33,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,8 | 1,4 | 2,7 | 0,6 | ||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,2 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 2,0 | ||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,5 | 2,7 | 1,5 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||