Segment
1. Dunlop Sport BluResponse Premium2. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs. Dunlop Sport BluResponse
Table of contents:
| # | Kumho Ecsta HS51
| Dunlop Sport BluResponse
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Kumho Ecsta HS51 and the Dunlop Sport BluResponse are two summer tyres that have been put to the test by various tyre testing organizations. This comparison is here to summarize their achievements, strengths, and weaknesses by focusing on their performances in mutual test environments.
The Kumho Ecsta HS51, a Chinese-made model, earned an overall rating of 78% in our tests. This speaks to its consistent performance across various parameters. In the comparison test done by Autobild, this tyre stood 17th out of 50 tyres, with high scores in Aquaplaning - both cross and longitudinal, Price/Value, Wet Handling, and Wet Side Guide. Despite its ranking, the HS51 showcases its value by offering excellent water displacement and a substantial grip on wet surfaces, all at a commendable price point. On the downside, it has been replaced by the Kumho Ecsta HS52, a newer model thought to deliver even better performance. More about this tyre.
On the other hand, The Dunlop Sport BluResponse holds an overall rating of 71% in our tests. In the same Autobild competition, the Dunlop tyre excelled by securing 6th place. This demonstrates a superior overall performance compared to the Kumho tyre. Worth noting are the notable features of Comfort which the tyre scored high on. Although unspecified where it is produced, one can tell by the high quality of its design and execution that it is crafted with attention to detail and comfort. There are no data available for a newer model replacing this tyre yet. More about this tyre.
In comparison, while the Kumho Ecsta HS51 provides excellent value and wet surface performance, the Dunlop Sport BluResponse ranks higher in overall performance, with a particular emphasis on ride comfort. If seeking a tyre providing outstanding value with good wet surface handling, consider the Ecsta HS51. For a prestigious blend of comfort and overall performance, opt for the Dunlop Sport BluResponse.
For more details, visit the manufacturers' pages: Kumho and Dunlop.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Dunlop Sport BluResponse Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Dunlop Sport BluResponse Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2 | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 | 34,8 | 30,4 | |||||
| Dunlop Sport BluResponse | 35,4 | 32,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 | 38,6 | 29,4 | |||||
| Dunlop Sport BluResponse | 35,7 | 29,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||