Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecowing ES31 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Kumho (60%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 has a better rating of 75% compared to 56% of the Kumho Ecowing ES31. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecowing ES31 was done in 2022, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Ecowing ES31 and the Ventus Prime3 K125 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 76% of Kumho Ecowing ES31 has B wet grip rating, whereas 76% of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 has A rating.
| # | Kumho Ecowing ES31
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | |
| Kumho Ecowing ES31 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | |
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,8 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
