Segment
1. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecowing ES31 vs. Firestone Roadhawk
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Kumho (60%). In this particular case, the Firestone Roadhawk has a better rating of 59% compared to 56% of the Kumho Ecowing ES31. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecowing ES31 was done in 2022, compared to 2018 when was the Firestone Roadhawk first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Ecowing ES31 and the Roadhawk were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 76% of Kumho Ecowing ES31 has B wet grip rating, whereas 99% of Firestone Roadhawk has A rating.
| # | Kumho Ecowing ES31
| Firestone Roadhawk
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | |
| Kumho Ecowing ES31 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | |
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,9 | 2,2 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,3 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
