Segment
1. Dunlop Sport BluResponse Premium2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Dunlop). Dunlop is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Dunlop summer tyres are slightly better rated (72%) than Kumho (60%). In this particular case, the Dunlop Sport BluResponse has a better rating of 71% compared to 56% of the Kumho Ecowing ES31. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecowing ES31 was done in 2022, compared to 2015 when was the Dunlop Sport BluResponse first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Ecowing ES31 and the Sport BluResponse were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 76% of Kumho Ecowing ES31 has B wet grip rating, whereas 74% of Dunlop Sport BluResponse has A rating.
# | Kumho Ecowing ES31
| Dunlop Sport BluResponse
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Dunlop Sport BluResponse Premium2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle
1. Dunlop Sport BluResponse Exemplary2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | |
Kumho Ecowing ES31 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | |
Dunlop Sport BluResponse Rating: Good | dobré | 2,3 | 2,1 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 2,1 | |
Show test details |