Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecowing ES31 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Kumho (60%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 has a better rating of 92% compared to 56% of the Kumho Ecowing ES31. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecowing ES31 was done in 2022, compared to 2018 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Ecowing ES31 and the Turanza T005 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 76% of Kumho Ecowing ES31 has B wet grip rating, whereas 83% of Bridgestone Turanza T005 has A rating.
| # | Kumho Ecowing ES31
| Bridgestone Turanza T005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | |
| Kumho Ecowing ES31 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | |
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,4 | 1,8 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 1,6 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
