Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Premium2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Kumho (60%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho Crugen HP91 and Michelin Primacy 3, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Kumho Crugen HP91 was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Michelin Primacy 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 235/50 R18 test, where both the Crugen HP91 and the Primacy 3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 66% of Kumho Crugen HP91 has B wet grip rating, whereas 92% of Michelin Primacy 3 has A rating.
# | Kumho Crugen HP91
| Michelin Primacy 3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R16 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Premium2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Exemplary2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Recommended2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
1. Michelin Primacy 3 71 dB
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Offroad | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
Kumho Crugen HP91 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2- | 2 | |||
Michelin Primacy 3 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2- | 2+ | 2 | |||
Show test details |